Live Like YouRe Dying Essay Example for Free

Live Like YouRe conclusion EssayClean, Cull, and Connect. In his short essay Live like youre expiry, Chuck Palahniuk refers them as the ternary Cs. After confirming that suicide is the only escape route, they are the three final chores you mustiness finish on your last lively week. Clean everything. Your bathroom, car, refrigerator, everything. Cull down your resources, donate and destroy complimentary possessions, and get a good haircut. Connect to everyone youve ever known and say something nice, no matter how pestiferous you hate them. Dont feel humiliated, youve got nonhing to lose except a few days of your life. Also, know that no one will remember you, know that the world will not variegate after you die. Know that you will not be missed. And after all of this, Palahniuk says you probably wont bother to kill yourself, since by then youll be surrounded by friends who recognize you as a decent and valuable friend. But there is more to the essay than explaining what the three Cs are. twain the title and content clearly spotlights death as a major concept of the essay, as close to of Palahniuks compositions are.Actually, Palahniuk touches on death so often that it seems he crumbnot go through a single essay without discussing about it. Also, from start to beginning, his sentences are written in such a decipherable way that the reader al nearly feels suicidal. Do everything. Destroy it. Treat yourself. Your oven will be clean, your car vacuumed. rase in the merriest mind, one cannot help but be persuaded that the world will crumble when the essay ends. wherefore does Palahniuk do so? It seems odd and arduous for any writer to be so deathly when he writes.Palahniuk was beleaguered by death all his life. In his mind, his happy family had already died when his parents divorced, leaving him and his three siblings to live with their grandparents. subsequent on, Palahniuk volunteered at a hospice as an escort, where he had to witness the death of a patient he had big attached to (which lead him to stop volunteer working). And around 1999, Palahniuks father Fred Palahniuk was shot and dragged into a foretoken which was put on fire. Palahniuk later on helped the decision of the killers death sentence, the ex-boyfriend of Fred Palahniuks girlfriend.Although death is a frequently visited topic for Palahniuk, he probably doesnt always write in such a deathly manner on purpose. But it is also not surprising that Palahniuk ends up writing about death every time. Palahniuks word choice during the essay is also different from the routine writer. Not only that most of them are short, but all of them are so-called easy actors line (perhaps procrastinate at the last paragraph is an exception). Of course, it comes from Palahniuks minimalistic writing philosophy, but anyone with internet connection to Wikipedia can figure that out.The question is, where does his writing philosophy come from? Palahniuk claims himself to be a romantic who expresses ideas that others do not believe in. It is only natural that he holds different ideas from the ordinary man, regarding the unordinary world he grew up in. Therefore, readers of Palahniuk strike to think twice about what he wrote to understand it. But complex words tend to take a leak an accurate meaning to it, which doesnt leave any space to think again about what he was actually trying to say. This leaves Palahniuk no choice but to use more flexible, simpler and original words.Although it doesnt immortalise in the essay Live like youre dying, an exception is when it comes to mechanics. For example, in his novel Fight Club, most of the processes in making plastic bombs or soap is described in an accurate manner. This is probably because Palahniuk use to work for Freightliner as a mechanic, but his tendency to describe mechanical processes accurately has less to do with his flow of words than we have interest to. As it has been clearly shown, Live like you re dying has a deep relation to Palahniuks background, almost as if the essay is a ass of Palahniuk.Everything that Palahniuk has been through, and is leaving through, is spilled out and spread, conscious or unconscious, on the computer screen when he writes. He cant help it. And it would be nonsense to say that this only counts for Chuck Palahniuk every essay is a shadow of the author in some way or the other, a footprint of what he has been through. Theres a sort of syllogism going on here what youve one is what you are, what you are is what you write, so what youve done is what you write. If you disagreed, youd be challenging Socrates.